Mid-term exam in MiT went down yesterday. Unfortunately without my local presence. After a foray to Denver to catch a special “Faculty Night” preview of the latest show at the MCA-Denver, I met Marisa for a bit and then headed home for some final tweaks to the exam. The structure of the exam evolved at least partly from my distaste for ‘standardized assessment’ in the learning context, but also from how the social dynamic of the class is naturally progressing. Technically the course is a ‘lecture’ course — meaning that the prof prepares and presents (highly organized!) packages of material along with readings and other material that the students have to digest. Some time may be designated for ‘discussion,’ but what quality of discussion can one have with 40 people? As this was easily the largest class group I’ve ever had in the last 25 years of teaching, I definitely was in for some troubles. Preparing a set of power-points that amply illustrate my take — the trajectory that I am mapping though the territory — would have taken weeks. Joel gave me all his which are very polished and content-rich, but I just couldn’t use them as it would have been a very unnatural scenario, delivering someone else’s view.
At any rate, the class as a group, led by a good number of individuals seems to have taken to self-directing the latter half of the semester. Group presentations every day until December. The idea of local knowledge-generation seems especially important in this age. So, the exam structure that I ended up coalescing around was group-work-based. Six groups of six, and one of three. The groups were composed of the same groupings that are scheduled for topical presenter/respondents. So, each group of six is composed of two smaller groups of three: the groups of three each have to run an entire class session on a particular topic in the next weeks, with the other group of three as their questioners (and note-takers). I created seven google-docs with 12 questions each, some of the questions the same across the different groups, mostly not, though.
At the start of the exam time, I release the google doc to each group and let them do whatever, however, for the 75 minutes.
The only hitch was that in the middle of the night before, I woke up really sick. Got up at 0600, and promptly started vomiting. I knew there was no way I could even cycle up to the university, I could barely keep my head without passing out. Argh! So, from bed, I got everything ready, and sent out an email to the class telling them what was going on. And, at 0900, released the docs, watched for a few minutes, passed out, woke up and it was 1000, and a couple students had emailed me that they hadn’t gotten access to the docs (fortunately, they did a work-around). After 15 minutes, I shut down the docs and collapsed back into bed for the next 24 hours. Some nasty bug, not sure really what it was, but a nasty headache, disorientation. Somewhat like a migraine, but not. Feeling somewhat better after 24 hours, but will have to stay in bed longer.
I’ll do a de-brief on Monday to see how it went. I am quite disappointed that I couldn’t have been there to see the activity, that was an important objective for me, although I do have the results in hand. Haven’t felt good enough to look at them yet. And have to get the last copy scan of the dissertation done so I can send it to Jan to get bound and over to the library. So that chapter will be DONE.