Tuesday, 23 January, 1962

Decided at 0600 today to write to the FAA Admin & Brad Morse, our Congressman from the district we live in.

When I stopped for HS this morning he said he had decided to attend the Shockley lecture at MIT tonight, so would drive in himself.

Rewrote Bob Davis’ paper on Simulation, making it shorted and more precise. He has a good outline.

Clear, cold

Drove in; HS is going to the Shockley lecture tonight.

Went over to Lexington to Dr. & Mrs. [??] home to the Park Street area mtg. Dr. Ockenga answered questions, the discussion turning to Catholicism and related topics — including a few comments on Determinism by John Ossepchuck.

Monday, 18 December, 1961

Went in to see Dr. Thoma at 11:30. He took 4 more x-rays; the condyle is apparently moving further out of place. He thought he might have to remove it if the socket is full of tissue. I’ll go ahead with this after returning from Ascension.

Started to correlate the in-flight and pre-flight msgs. with the corresponding test data. Couldn’t make sense of the initial try, as different units origins are involved.

Jack Nolan in to talk about generalized simulation. It seems that he has gotten hold of a EJCC paper that shows a generalized framework for systems simulation. He saw my last progress report citing “data flow” and thought his newly-formed method of attack (?) on the Army problem is unique! I proposed that this be done a year ago in 22L0078. JN thought this scheme was applicable to the Ascension problem.

Overcast, ice fall

Stopped at Mill Dam Supply to show the mechanics the inside of the Toro power handle. It needs a new crankshaft. He gave me another old engine to dismantle. He said he would order a new connecting rod.

Went into Boston to see Dr. Thoma re: my jaw — will have him operate when I return from Ascension — see other diary.

Started to read the references on the Syntopicon — on Wisdom — there are some gems in Plato’s Republic, Book VII.

Monday, 11 December, 1961

Sat in a mtg. from 9-3:30 PM to discuss our activities last week. No clear pattern of trouble was apparent.

It was the consensus of opinion to a) document our notes by Wednesday PM, b) work out a simulation schema for routine use for the Ascension complex in trouble-shooting. We plan to have another meeting on Thursday morning.

I proposed the use of a print-out, produced by both simulation and live runs, to show RAE as a function of time at various places through the -16 & TTR systems in combination.

Tuesday, 18 April, 1961

Discussion with JH on his problem of a house; he likes Fred Plotner’s houses, as I do, but Fred is too far away from us. He will write to Fred.

Disc. with JH on how to use the Dynamo II Compiler on the Army context: what problems can be worked on with this tool? It is clear to me what can be done with a laboratory man-machine simulation, but not what can be done with Dynamo.

Phoned Dr. Kent at OEG in Washington re: his letter of 13 April; will meet him here on 10 May in the afternoon. Referred him to WSEG SS16 & the April 1961 issue of Proc. IRE.

Tuesday, 11 April, 1961

3 April issue of Aviation Week noted the Director of the FAA BRD will resign as of July!

Had several discussions with Mike Bavaro re: the Army’s management problem on ADPS.

Worked on the Reaction Time Analysis for the quarterly report. The next step is to try to select a few representative targets.

Had some discussion with Al Armenti; he is unaware of the payoff from developmental simulation, and is apparently completely hardware oriented.

Rec’d announcement of the summer course on methodology of Industrial Dynamics from Prof. Forrester’s office; it will be held from 13-23 July with a fee of $325! Set up an appointment with Forrester for 17 April at 3 PM.

Call from Dr. Miser: 1) He spoke of Jim Digby of Rand being on the FAA Hough Committee (noted in Aviation Week of 3 April); 2) An OEG chap, Clem King (?) has a paper on radar performance and HJM wanted me to review it from the experimental point of view.

Overcast, windy

Rode in AM with Jack Dargan, and with Jim Mayo of Publications in the PM.

Took the broken screen door apart and cut the top & bottom pieces to fit the back door; found that the new aluminum die-castings for the corners will not fit, so couldn’t finish the operation.

Monday, 27 March, 1961

Spent the day at Rand, having having what seemed to me to be a very fruitful time discussing the details & payoff from simulation. Took ten pages of notes.

Spent a most profitable day at Rand.

Phoned George Stroebe; his older son has been in a cast with a broken thigh bone, but is getting better now. The elder Mr. and Mrs. Stroebe are also well. It was good to talk with him.

modeling / simulation

The modeling approach has an advantage of any mathematical model; it can predict situations that cannot be reached experimentally. If quantitative data obtained from a well designed experiment allow a model to be constructed, the functionality of which is tested by comparison with experiments, the model can serve to investigate an infinite number of different situations such as those caused by mutagenesis, changes in activity of the elements of the system, etc. The model allows the dynamics of the process and the terminal states of the system to be investigated. It can bypass experimental limitations and thus explore biological situations currently restricted by experimental accessibility. It also brings deeper understanding of the nature of the whole process. The simulation capabilities are unlimited and can provide a check on the intuitive understanding of a process. — Vohradsky, J., 2001. Neural Model of the Genetic Network. THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 276(39), p. 36173.

Monday, 20 March, 1961

JLV set up a visit with Aeronutronics on 23 March, so we’ll be going out Wednesday. I called Mr. David Stoller at Rand re: his paper on management information systems; he also referred me to Glenn Craig, Director of the Logistics Laboratory; they will set up a conference on 27 March on management info systems, CCIS, and simulation.

Spent half day in office, going home about 1:30 pm. Went over to Dr. Bell at the Acton Medical Center for a checkup. He took a blood ample and went over me, asking the usual questions of medical history. I referred him to Dr. Metzger & Dr. Ordman for my previous medical records.

Thursday, 23 February, 1961

Gave Gail the draft of Recommendation E; her typewriter is out of order, so someone else got it.

Went in to MIT in evening to hear Gen. Bergquist, Cdr. C2D2, speak at an IRE/PGEM mtg. He made 3 points of interest to me: 1) That integration in the case of different functional areas must cut across these areas and go into each functional area in depth; 2) That the military must function in the light of the C2 System/Weapon/Logistics combination; 3) That AFC2D2 is using simulation — at SDC and here — to ascertain the essence of integration, i.e., the subject matter of each functional area that is essential for command purposes. He hit the point on all of these.

In a discussion with JFN, he (after a session with the other group) wants JLV & I to work up a position to answer the question of whether of not to put automatic machine-to-machine communication in at all Simplex Centers. This is the wrong problem, but we’ll do it!

Foggy
Rain in PM

Arrived at office at 0745.

Went to hear Gen. Bergquist talk about the C2D2. It was good, see record in work diary.

Picked up NJH about 9:45 PM.

Wednesday, 08 February, 1961

Started to write the draft committee report. RJB came in with a written note on the need for further reaction time analysis. I’ll include it as Tab D. JLV’s writeup of the Two Uses of Single Thread Analysis will be Tab B, with Tab A my section on the Nature of the Proposed Simulation and Tab C, JHH’s note on Successive Simplification of the Problem Area. About half of all this is typed.

Took Toro parts to the Milldam Supply; found the piston rigs badly worn. Bought a new set and a head gasket; reconnected the piston back in with the new rings.

Went with the Meades over to the Lexington area meeting of the Church. Mr. Marshall spoke on the needs of the Church.

Tuesday, 31 January, 1961

Continued to work on “Proposal”, getting most of it into typing.

Sat in a Simplex Group mtg. where Joe H. and I reported on our trip to the TAG board. I also reported on our committee work, saying a) that at our last mtg I thought we had gotten at least tentative agreement on one of the principle parameters, Time; b) that I am trying to get out a draft of a tentative Committee Report for discussion purposes. The discussion provided by members of the other Committee indicates that they are no further along. JFN requested that the reports be in his hands on 10 February.

Evening: Decided to leave out the reference to the FAA simulation going on at NAFEC in the letter to Sen. Monroney.

Interchanged the two 6CA7 tubes in the Dynakit; both are okay, so my trouble is in the input circuits. It looks as if a 25 amp coupling condenser has leaked.

JLV took me to the bank at noon; I opened a savings account with $250.

Monday, 30 January, 1961

Wrote the first two pages of a note to JFN on “Proposal to Provide Ways & Means to Generate Guidelines for Orderly CCIS Development and Integration.” This mt’l comes hard. Am expressing the point of view that a feedback model, based on a single thread, with a single center first, leading to “n” centers, would constitute an appropriate developmental simulation.

Talked with Jack Grenell on the phone re: the pictorial computer for cockpit use. He agreed with the text I already had.

(evening) Typed letter to Senator Monroney in final form.

JHH suggested that my lack of fidelity in the radio system might be due to a faulty tube in the output stage of the power amplifier. Finally got around to checking this at 10 PM; pulling one tube made no difference in the output.

Put the letter to Senator Monroney in final form.

Friday, 27 January, 1961

Continued to work on the “Proposal.” EK, in talking to JLV, mentioned that he was uncertain of our job. What I’m drafting up will outline a task for several people for 2-3 years.

D. P. Campbell’s paper on “Dynamic Behavior of Linear Production Systems” in Mechanical Engineering for April 1953, has a good scheme for the identification or isolation of unit processes.

JHH brought me a paper by R. L. Chapman of TRWR at Denver on System Simulation.

(evening) Typed first draft of letter to Senator Monroney re: the FAA research program.

Deposited rent check in bank and obtained a savings account signature card.

Phoned ten Toro dealers to see if I could find a place that will sell a Sno-Go and generator at a discount; none would. Went to the Milldam Supply Company in Concord and bought a Sno-Go two years old for $60. I’ll get the generator later. We ought to get an electric circular saw with a chain saw attachment.

Thursday, 26 January, 1961

Worked on the generation of a proposal to the Army for a “Suggested Method of Obtaining Guidelines for the Orderly Development of their CCIS. Prof. Forrester at MIT has an excellent paper on Industrial Dynamics that is an excellent source of ideas; for example, he defines simulation as the technique of obtaining results from a model.

Picked up the mail, getting it for the first time since Monday. Martin Koenig, Realtor at Key Realty Co., sent a check for $180.50 for the rent for our house in McLean, with the house and rental agreement.

Phoned him re: the sentence in the rental agreement about the swimming pool access in that I would like to substitute the word “access” for the word “membership;” he agreed.

Wednesday, 25 January, 1961

Spent morning with JLV trying to develop a basis for proceeding in Phase II. Rewrote an outline of what simulation could do in the present Simplex situation. After some disc. with JFH, we managed to communicate with him. We are basically talking about a much broader operation than just “Simplex Evaluation.” I believe we can generate a “Proposal for a Method of Obtaining Technical Guidance in Designing & Integrating the CCI System.”

Cold, 0˚F

Car stalled shortly after leaving the Lab parking lot. Gail Luther ferried me to the Base Gas Station where I put up $5 for a can and then put 3 gallons of gas in the tank, also pouring some in the carburetor. After some time it started, and I drove to a gas station, to find the tank would only take 8 gallons. There must have been ice in the fuel system somewhere — a first for me! I should keep the tank full!

Took DCH to Scout mtg.

Tuesday, 24 January, 1961

JFN agreed to leave the Flow Diagrams with the number codes out of the Phase I Report due to the deadline of 27 January.

Finished Trip Report; will circulate it under a 22L without duplicating all the tabs.

Wrote travel voucher.

Conducted mtg. of Ad Hoc Committee on “Evaluation.” This mtg was a little more receptive to a newer way of thinking. There was apparently general agreement on the use of Time as a basic parameter, perhaps the most important. RJB started a disc. on the production of graphs to show how an automated & a non-automated system would react. Basic groundwork of this nature is essential for simulation. Since most the committee members are tied into the Phase I Report deadline on Friday, we will have another discussion mtg with some more writing.

Took JCH to the doctor who said he had a bad cold. Tobramycin was prescribed.

Tuesday, 10 January, 1961

LCH has car today so she can go to the Brownie mtg. Rode with a neighbor.

Went on in to the MIT library and was successful in locating a paper on “Feedback in Organizational Systems” by R. B. Wilson, now of RCA at Burlington.

Worked out a change to Phase I Recom. 8: consideration should be given to setting a goal of putting a pre-Simplex system into the 8th Army by 1966; this would provide a way to introduce the Simplex System gradually by 1970.

Also, Recom. 10: This conclusion should be supported by the recommendation that developmental simulation (or adaptive simulation) be carried out in progressive stages to determine the necessary integration of the functional sub-systems and control programs.

Rec’d letter from Martin Koenig of Key realty Co., 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington 3, Va., offering to rent my house for 5% a month; he thinks he can get $180-190/mo for it.

Put final coat of finish on DCH’s 2nd closet door.

DCH has decided to enter the science fair with his project of last year, use slide photography to provide the means for control.

Monday, 09 January, 1961

Started to read the Phase I Report. Discussed an addition to Recom. 10 re: simulation (developmental) with JH; we rewrote it to his satisfaction.

Re: the trip to the TAG Board, started to get the originals together for making slides. Called Col. Halper at Fort Harrison; we do not need clearances.

The rail/air situation to Indianapolis looks better than all air or all rail.

Marked the charts in the Phase I report that we need for the trip to Indianapolis. Will start tomorrow to get them reproduced.

Col. Halper’s phone in Indianapolis is LIberty 6-9211 xt 2191; Lt. Col. Jacobs xt 664; Major McAber xt 2208.

LCH to GS Staff mtg in evening.

Had to spank DCH because of back talk at dinner.

Put screws in peg board at right of back door.

Thursday, 05 January, 1961

JFN called a Section mtg at 0900 to tell us what Phase II of this project will consist of. After some discussion it was pointed out by Col. Bavaro that Col. Darnell at Hq CONARC conceives that we will refine the concept of Simplex as set forth in Phase I to the point where a contractor can take it over for implementation.

Al Armentis & I reported on the identification of our respective committees.

Had sub-committee meeting in the afternoon. It was much more positive than the other two. RB described his feedback model, which sounds good. I left at 1530 to take LCH to the Dedicatory Concert of the organ at Park Street. JH gave some remarks on his center simulation idea, and JLV on the single thread idea. It looks as if we can tie these together. Col. Small seems enthusiastic on this.

Took LCH to the Organ Dedicatory Concert at the church. The organist was Virgil Fox of the Riverside Church in New York. It was certainly a revelation to see and hear him, a master of expression.

We left the girls at Mary’s and found on arriving that she had decided to go to the concert, which she did on the subway. We left the car at Kendall Square.

I ran out of gas and had to walk over 1/2-mile for help, finally ending up at Dr. Moore’s residence in Lexington. I phoned the police, who referred me to the road service station on Rt. 128 — five gallons of gas cost $4.85 at 12:30 AM.

Wednesday, 04 January, 1961

Continued to read the “TOC Concept” to see if some ideas on center simulation can be generated. (I put myself on this sub-committee). So far this isn’t easy to work out. Had a lengthy discussion with JH on this scheme for center simulation.

DCH’s report card for Nov & Dec is of the same total quality of that for the last previous interval; this time he got a C in Ancient History, down from a B. He has to make A’s or B’s in all major subjects to make the Honor Roll.

Went to Scout mtg; a Winter Survival overnight camp is planned for 1-14/15.

Went in to Cambridge to rent a tuxedo for the dinner party tomorrow night. Took JLV on down to MIT to get an Institute catalog. He expects to take at least one class for credit.

Tuesday, 03 January, 1961

BS terminated his connection with the ad hoc Eval Committee.

In a discussion with JFN:

1) Made the point of frustration expressed on 12-29-60; suggested that he call a section mtg and outline what he conceives Phase II to consist of.

2) We have 2 sub-committees working:

a) Single thread use;
b) Simulation of a center.

Discussed with JLV the need for survival activities. It seems to me that in order for large scale survival to occur, a central authority must see that food & water are available again within weeks of the blasts. This in my opinion requires Presidential action.

Worked on “TOC Concept” document.

JFN wants JH & I to go out to the TAG Board on 1-18/19/20 for discussions on Simplex.

Discussed with Bob Bergemann the need of FAA for an indicator on the radar scope to show the clear airspace/ok for safety reasons as well as the separation distances. He was lukewarm to the patent idea.

Rec’d letter from Mrs. Brennan wanting me to list the house again for sale at a commission of 6%; she pointed out that a house in the neighborhood with an unfinished basement and carport was FHA approved at $24,500.

I’ll try again to rent it; wrote this date to Martin Koenig, recommended by Mrs. Brennan.

Rec’d letter from Fairfax police agreeing to put on their daily check list.

Perhaps we should go down this weekend.

Sydney Non-Objective Gallery exhibition

[ed: An excerpt of neoscenes::drift was recently included in the Sydney Non-Objective Catalogue and CD 2005-2010, SNO Gallery, Sydney, AU, 2010 (gallery catalog and audio CD) ISBN 978-0-9805877-3-9, Mar 2010]

reflections on neoscenes :: drift

lost in a maelstrom of sonic simulations and stimulations, re-collected, re-presented, via various creato-destructive algorithmic methodologies, drift moves through many post-cartesian spaces and through several parallel universes. depending on your frame of reference you may follow a similar path. or you may not. drift demands relativity and provides quantum realism.


(01:00:00, stereo audio, 115 mb)

blurb for SNO gallery exhibition web site, November 2009, NSW, Australia:

drift arises from an ordered archive of ambient phonographic fragments recorded over the past twenty years or so. From this archive improvisational works are assembled: indeterminate and reductive modulations that critically sample the flow of embodied be-ing. Known objects and discrete events populate our world only because we are social animals who have learned the dominant protocols of the techno-social system that we inhabit. This condition is especially onerous with the protocols circumscribing the failed (object-oriented) materialist worldview. drift consciously moves algorithmically with-in and with-out of recognizable protocols, acknowledging that without these memory-impressed protocols, all immediate experience becomes an incomprehensible flow. However, the cosmos we participate in, and indeed, are part of, is composed of these flows and comprehension is an illusion. What we know is only the temporal persistence of patterns in our embodied consciousness which resonate with an attenuated selection of those flows. drift simulates the full signal width of the flows, recognizable or not, and simply transits the field which is the present.

more “Sydney Non-Objective Gallery exhibition”

thesis proposal :: Background

Background for Research

While individual human presence in this world has fundamental repercussions on be-ing, it is the ever-present and synergistic exchange between humans — forming what I call a “continuum of relation” — that governs much of life. This energetic field of human relation is sometimes fraught with difficulties and complications in spite of the rich and necessary dynamic it brings to life. Technology, as a ubiquitous factor in mediating human relation, often dominates while presented as providing the only opportunity for mediated connection and interaction between humans.

Presence, as apprehended by the Other, circumscribes a range of sensory inputs that require energy (from the Self) to stimulate and drive. The efficacy and sustainability of human connection builds on the very real and tangible transmissions and receptions of energy between the Self and the Other. An interconnected plurality of dialectic human relation may be described as a network. These networks, made up of a web of Self-Other connections form the base fabric of the continuum of relation. Technology appears in these networks as the mediating pathway that is the carrier of energy from node to node, person to person. Technological systems also appear to apply absolute restraints on and attenuation of the idiosyncratic flows inherent in that continuum of relation. The discrete objects that populate the (technological) landscape of the continuum of relation and that modulate the character of communications are literally artifacts of a materialist point of view. A primary assumption in my research is that a materialist or mechanistic view of the world no longer suffices to adequately circumscribe the phenomena occurring within the continuum of relation. more “thesis proposal :: Background”

migrating realities performance

Technically this is a simulation of the live visual-sonic mix I did late this evening for a decent crowd at the migrating realities conference…

The Wild Surmise

Sue Thomas poses some interesting questions in her search for possible synergies between the cyber and the natural. it’s an open project — add you own answers on her site!

Please describe where you lived and your strongest memories of nature during the years of your growing up. I’m interested in both positive and negative recollections of anything from the smallest plot to the largest wilderness, including animals and plants.

sotto voce: I am a native of Alaska, born there as a Cold War military child. My father, a senior Pentagon analyst, sport-hunted grizzly and polar bears among other magnificent animals. We moved to Boston, then Southern California, then Washington DC, living in suburban or rural fringes of cities. A primal memory was of viewing a total solar eclipse from a beach in Acadia National Park in the northeast state of Maine, USA, at five years old. Watching the sun be consumed, until there was only a shimmering ring of fire surrounding a black hole in the sky. My father was an amateur astronomer, and I accompanied him on a further four total eclipse expeditions. Along with these specific memories, there are general memories of sleeping in the woods, of eating around a fire, of washing in streams, mosquitoes, and dark star-brilliant skies. more “The Wild Surmise”

amplification, initial round

Miss a meeting with Angela, got the wrong cafe in Hyde Park, there are two. Sent a SMS, but got no response. Ended up doing more audio work — of the Salvation Army Band in front of the big ANZAC Memorial. Called her, but she must not have had her phone on.

(00:09:21, stereo audio, 18 mb)

Wandered down to Darling Harbor to sit and write about amplification, surrounded by amplified and simulated culture. Hmm, the relationship between amplification and simulation could also be interesting to explore. Where amplification is a (possible) subset of simulation. Because the amplified signal is no longer the thing itself, but a simulation of the thing itself with a change of character, volume in the case of auditory works, intensification in the general sense — the intensification of a particular neurological input signal whatever the input is. At base, electrical — as in the stimulation of the auditory nerves. So, an intensification and sometimes narrowing of frequency (bandwidth) of the signal. Simulation is also about the re-creation of an original signal — one whose characteristics are well known — a re-production of those characteristics.

The better-known the parameters, the better that the signal can be re-produced. Always a reduction, always not the thing itself. Always the reductive. Efficient perhaps, amplifying the essential. But who determines the essential? That is embedded in the technology which is a determinate (determinating) product of the social system. Therein is one source of a significant skewing factor in the presence of these amplified and simulated signals. That the characteristic of these signals are being largely determined by a dominant social system which may or may not be optimized for the individual, or for even the greater good. Because the generating system for these re-productions has a long-term directional inertia coming from the technological production process — the larger the infrastructure (the more generally and specifically) complex the social production system, the greater the inertia, the greater the inertial resistance to changing conditions, the less relevant the amplified signal is to the individual or collective itself.

more meetings

Bad night’s sleep again, not sure where that is coming from. Feng shui of hotel rooms. Don’t like hotels. Open window too noisy to sleep; closed, nose imitates room and stuffs. Maybe caffeine. Some small cups of coffee during meetings, not just to be polite, but it smells so good. So, wake up before alarm, force the obligatory liter of water down, gradually clear head. body drags along behind. pack, and hobble down to breakfast and wifi access to at least consume croissants and Eudora. And some Firefox. Though belly is fat and getting fatter. Can’t wait for a swim, cycle, something aerobic. But Dirk has made a tight schedule of luxurious 2-3 hour meetings with such an interesting variety of people. And so, this morning, he comes to breakfast a bit after Thomas Laureyssens comes tentatively to my table.

Excellent generation of ideas, intuitive connections, and pathways, dynamically evolving possibility. Thomas is working on a social networking project which aims to create a functional gateway for Belgian new media initiatives.

Brussels as the background. some good food, some short visions, hardly any time to catch the tourist scene, and no photographs made. Nothing missed on that account. Previous visits, the most recent was in 2000 for the closing cafe9.net meeting which ended up in the scandalous shouting match among participants at a Chinese restaurant. So much for European solidarity.

Dirk and Thomas head off after Angelo Vermeulen arrives for a short meeting before I have to catch the train to Maastricht.

Angelo illustrates my dialogue-based worldview with several direct anecdotes which counterpoint his prodigious and stimulating formal creative output. And reminds me a bit painfully the lack of a PhD is a deterrent to social viability. That or a book. So that story haunts again in the background. Text trumps lived praxis, title trumps actual presence. sheesh.

We have lunch at the Brasserie Falstaff with a nice interior where “you can admire the transition from Art Nouveau to Art Deco,” and the staff looking like they should be in a Paris bistro. And the pay toilets governed by a wrinkled old lady. Just the way it used to be. Mais oui! Typically touristic, with a complete backwards look to the future. Tourists would never distinguish that this is not real. Maybe tourists are so conditioned by looking at the world via tele-vision, that when confronted by the real thing, they cannot tell when it is a simulation of something else authentic. Like Disneyland. Seems like a great place to actualize physical presence in the ‘world’ when compared to prime-time teevee. uff!

(00:04:52, stereo audio, 9.4 mb)

Over to Maastricht, train to bus to Rod and Lizbet’s place. Nine years since last time. Catching up on years of remote art, music, books, Iceland gossip. Talk about getting more of Rod’s work online aside from the wiki page that a friend has done—he’s a networker, and a singular one of that breed, a networker’s networker. No time to worry about publicity, the market, promotion. The work and the network are all that counts, matters, all that provides life reason. His output into that network is prodigious, profound, and humane. His archive is priceless, marvelous!

response to Lev

sotto voce: Some comments (on the nettime post from Lev Manovich, Mon, 28 Nov 2005 21:22:03 -0800 – his text snips in yellow)…

We Have Never Been Modular…

but we have agreed-upon standards via political hegemony, pressure of dominant ideas, and participating in the easy consumption of ‘whatever works’. And since standards underlie the concept of modularity, I’m afraid that I disagree unless you are talking about another collective “we” that is represented by the demographic you are addressing and are member of.

Thanks to everybody who commented on my text “Remix and Remixability” (November 16, 2005). It was provoked by reading about web 2.0 and all the excitement and hype (as always) around it, so indeed I am “following the mainstream view” in certain ways. But I would like to make it clear that ultimately we are talking about something which does not just apply to RSS, social bookmarking, or Web Services. We are talking about the logic of modularity which extends beyond the Web and digital culture…

And it is worth mentioning that none of those ideas are remotely sourced in digital technologies — they are constructed on the entire precursor socio-technical infrastructure of engineering in general. digital technologies are a ‘final’ product of a long and continuous development process of standardization that started when Empire (or collective social life) was born.

Modularity has been the key principle of modern mass production. Mass production is possible because of the standarisation of parts and how they fit with each other – i.e. modularity. Although there are historical precedents for…

From an engineering point of view, modularity is a subsequent process result following the necessary precursor: the development of standards.

As a simple anecdote, I recall traveling across Europe in the early 80’s. When crossing a border, say, between Italy and Germany, or France and Germany, aside from the ritual rubber-stamping of the passport (and occasional body searches, but that’s another story), one was aware that suddenly, when before the streets were full of Renaults, Citroens, and Peugeots, they were now filled with VWs, Mercedes, and BMWs. To such a degree that if you saw a Citroen Deux Cheveaux puttering around in Bavaria — a car I occasionally had in those days — you would invariably honk and wave (at the ‘hippies’). The currency changed, the language changed (obviously), the places for money exchange shifted, the electric plugs morphed, the telephone rings, cables, and plugs changed. Distance didn’t unless one crossed the Channel where temperature, length, weight, currency divisions, and volume changed to absurdly baffling non-decimal fractions. The socio-political history of the EU (and globalization as well) is mapped over the development of international standards that (have) effectively wiped out those prior social differences.

The history underlying any and all movements towards a pervasive technology (regardless of the geographic extent) is the history of standards development. This precedes any (modular) engineering deployments. (A wonderful USD350 million glitch on a NASA Mars project — when an engineer (collaborating with ESA) forgot to convert between metric and US measurements). Of course, economic (military) hegemony is absolutely connected to this process of standards development. You join in a military alliance and if you are the minor partner, you have to re-bore your cannons to take his caliber of projectile, lest, in the heat of battle, you run out of usable ammunition.

I think a discussion of standardization supersedes the discussion of modularity as most (all!?) characteristics that arise in a description of modularity and its impacts are derived from the ‘textures’ of the socio-technical landscape that are determined by standardization. In a way, collective knowledge as a very broad and general social product is a result of standardization, especially if you are considering, for example, knowledge that spans disparate physical locations. Even with the existence of the basic technology of the Internet, no collective knowledge may be derived without a standardization that transcends the physical restraints on the digital system — a primary one being calibration of time scales, but there are many other calibrations that must take place as well. In the Paul Edwards article quoted below, he points out that there are heavy consequences for detecting global warming because the propagation of measurement standard differences between national and international organizations. An example of the fragility of knowledge building and the importance of standards in collective action.

Strip Latin from biological nomenclature, and international collaboration in the entire discipline is immediately snuffed.

It would seem that the larger the social span of an institution, the greater the built-in desire to establish and propagate standards among its constituents. Maybe remix is the ultimate surrender of the individual to the collective. Standardized idiosyncrasy. Lovely end result.

And at the other extreme, some of the more powerful expressions of artistic creativity take place in a landscape where there is some freedom to deliberately ignore standards (and modularity) and filter lived experience through the idiosyncratic filter of self — re-presenting that lived experience rather than an obsession with filtering someone else’s signal…

I think your mention of musicians sampling published music points to something perhaps more tiresome — related to the instance when rock stars sing about life as a rock star. A simulation of a simulation. TeeVee shows about teevee producers. Escher’s lizard consuming itself. Maybe remix culture will turn out to be so efficient that it will come to that — annihilation by self-consumption of its own mediated worldview…

Maintaining consistency in this huge, constantly changing network is the work of standards. Standards are socially constructed tools: They embody the outcomes of negotiations that are simultaneously technical, social, and political in character. Like algorithms, they serve to specify exactly how something will be done. Ideally, standardized processes and devices always work in the same way, no matter where, what, or who applies them. Consequently, some elements of standards can be embedded in machines or systems. When they work, standards lubricate the construction of technological systems and make possible widely shared knowledge. — Paul N. Edwards

Edwards, P.N., 2004. A Vast Machine: Standards as Social Technology. Science, 304(7 May 2004), pp.827-828.

Measurement is a comparison process in which the value of a quantity is expressed as the product of a value and a unit; that is, Quantity = {a numerical value} x {unit} where the unit is an agreed-upon value of a quantity of the same type. The concept of a quantity such as length is independent of the associated unit; the length is the same whether it is measured in feet or meters. A standard is a physical realization of the definition, with an agreed-upon value to be used as a reference. — Jeff Flowers

Flowers, J., 2004. The Route to Atomic and Quantum Standards. Science, 306(19 November 2004), pp.1324-1330.

The Energy Dynamics of Technologically-Mediated Human Relation within Digital Telecommunications Networks

A proposal by John Hopkins for Doctoral Thesis research at the University of Bremen, Department of Computer Science (Informatiks) [editor’s note: this initial proposal never was submitted following the accident of 04 July 2005 that set life on another trajectory.]

1.0 Statement of Problem

1.1 Introductory note

Beginning with a series of broad general statements that converge to frame the trans-disciplinary space of my inquiry, I will move to proposals that are more specific. This approach is an important feature of the research itself — where the applicability and efficacy of a model is best challenged when looking from absolute specific cases to increasingly general situations and vice versa. In framing this essentially divergent research, I would suggest that the proposal first be considered as a whole — as I understand that the depth of my knowledge-base varies across some of the disciplinary spaces. more “The Energy Dynamics of Technologically-Mediated Human Relation within Digital Telecommunications Networks”

earth-sky convergences

canyon face in there. juniper there, grass, cedar, sage, rock, rock face. having a gravity. yesterday taking another side slot-canyon, up and up to gain the bench-top over-looking the campground. find two un-matched halves, elk antlers, 7-points each, so, 14-point animals. one almost as tall as Loki. after seeing the bighorn sheep kill earlier in the day, lower jaw crushed, nose chewed away. the mountain lions have things pretty good, except for the constant interference of humans into their wide-patterned space. Loki playing in the dirt. part of the time, this seems problematic, the play seems to be generated from a vacant boredom that I can’t fill, nor would really choose to, other times, it seems to be holy. god-inspired, god-directed, god-sanctioned play that is of evolution-leaping intensity compared to the Game-Boy. what a stupid vapid name for an object devoid of any redeeming spiritual value. a generation of gamers swallowing simulations, and the entertained. faugh, what will come of that? everything is boring. speed is fun. simulation is way better than the real thing. not sure that this auto-adapter is running right. worked on the plane, but now, not able to concentrate anyway, on anything, too stressed about being a dull parent. maybe starting to count days until this phase is over. but next week back to school. teaching again. reading Lemke’s draft of a concept of “traversals” — recalling a flash of text that dropped into one of the Solstice videos that I made in Iceland. traverse no zenith. so it goes. battery runs low. no satellite uplink anyway, so bloggish reflections are useless. darkness falls. I will sleep on the ground tonight, and hope for the best. something nervous, but not for any good reason. with towering face of sandstone leaping to converge with rotating Milky Way.

mapping transitions

almost a month later. in the middle of a conference. mapping transitions. academic discourse. so. stream notes. what do pictues want? god is an artist. reductions (models, models, models, built on each other, intertwined. biocybernetics. science/technology making bio-sciences possible. cloning and computers. extended sense. political economy that runs the world. world of computer station, tangled wires. cybernetics: the steersman. kybernaut. writing as control system. not law, but the actual technologic/semiotic (phonetic) tools. (code writers). conflict of visual orgy and at the time of triumph of the digital (logos). analogical arguments. (dominant). terminator of liquid metal. ultimate simulator. academicians desperately searching for a label. an interpretive system to decode what the hell is going on. building a new model with old embedded pieces which have no inherent difference in structural predicate. sa-mo, sa-mo. formative paradigms are old. 1) copy original 2) artist and work (subject:object) 3) temporality (remember Virilio, huh?) 4) time of gain. uniqueness. copy has more aura than original.

enhancements of amplification (reproduction): are they qualitative improvements? reproductive cloning — an improvement?

actual and mediated. (electronic media is given a certain status of unprecedented power.) “new media.” participates in “massaged” production. mechanistic view. the aesthetics of digital media? (what about defining what the hell “digital media” is? (instead of defining it’s “fit” into the hegemonic/dominant worldview). hybrid aesthetics? why not just toss it out…? simulation. materialistic presence. current, seeking closure in the circuit. remix, unlocking input and output authenticity. (digital images and digital culture and rituals of new media). new vs traditional: imitations. virtuality. ontological status. proper character. procedural, conceptual (don’t fit…). anti-materialist. (medium is not the point). thesis-antithesis. we’re not allowed to make progress? hierarchies of form. perfection of expression. useful ways to talk about objects. (and subject experience). taste. rational cultivation. descriptive systems assume static forms of … aesthetics of change. mechanistic production. potential literature. procedural methods. with certain sensibilities. floods of wards. static bodies in space. reading texts. monolithic and reified forms of presentation. (any tweaking of of meta shakes the whole tree, gimme a chain saw). key forms of reference — generative: Pannini, Turing, Babbage, procedural, Stockhausen, and so on. iterative. new objects. rethink premises of knowledge production. aesthetics is about awareness. (iterative), step beyond — in flux. two feet in the mechanistic…

swarming

taking quantum to its conclusion — points to a movement from product to process to practice — (Saskia Sassen — the “meaning” of the activities in the digital sphere is the total accumulation of all practices that take place in that space … MAKE THE LEAP…

anthropological centrism. mapping transitions. (remembering the new world order is a limited access, top of a hierarchical high). indigenous technology. Inuit Broadcast Corporation. media-maintenance. next5minutes comes up, tactical media. good topic.

reproduction (gathering and redistribution of original energized event creates a pseudo-powerful illusion, but this is purely illusion based on the hegemonic (and static) position of the “reproducer” within an implied “global” order … the photograph in the world order (re-radiated Light from the self.) … some forms of hypertext with image are nice, but. just ’cause it’s horizontal?

Anyone who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments of the eyes are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true of the mind’s eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye; and he who remembers this when he sees anyone whose vision is perplexed and weak, will not be too ready to laugh; he will first ask whether that soul of man has come out of the brighter life, and is unable to see because unaccustomed to the dark, or having turned from darkness to the day is dazzled by excess of light. And he will count the one happy in his condition and state of being, and he will pity the other; or, if he have a mind to laugh at the soul which comes from below into the light, there will be more reason in this than in the laugh which greets him who returns from above out of the light into the den. — Plato’s Cave

caves, CAVES, and caves. technocracy. aristocracy of technology. networks of expensive, institution-oriented situations, (isolated from the Light, Light re-amplified, reflected, refracted, energized). “gotta have content.” flippant sycophant, mouthpiece of the complex. access. high-end polarity. slick-packaged technological. famous last words. manipulation and collaborative interaction. glib passing over any moral embeddedness of the power structure. fair use. attitudes of use.

can’t recall

moving along. with a short stop/lunch with folks at the Computer Science / Media Department of the University of Lübeck who will be involved in the establishment of the International School of New Media that Hubertus has been working on in the last couple years. they will move into a nice new location, the Media Docks, immediately adjacent from the old town. more of the old Hanseatic traditions. so it goes.

heading for Copenhagen via the boat at Puttgarten.

there is no voice that can speak life. but to get into a dance with the Void. I have not changed. at all. no evolution, no learning. only going. parsing input data, but it is routed to the same boxes. as ever. no cross-over networks, re-routed neurons. learning systems. knee-jerking. hard-wired. why no escape?

smoke rising from farm fires in the Danish countryside. and in my gaze there is a reach into the terrain’s history. looking for mounds, barrows, and the “holm gards”: reading the “Heimskringla” epic of the Age of Vikings on my PalmPilot. simulation.

have to write to Marcel to see if he remembers what I said about networks in Zurich — at some point I made a short statement, and in the moment, thought it was very apropos, especially when I observed that everyone in the entire room paused to write it down. but I have since forgotten what it was! “a network is…” or “a network isn’t…” gees.

Shell Point

Shell Point retirement community. a TOTALLY different reality from that of the rest of the world. and watching Daniel Boone as an Admiral in the English fleet fighting the French. Europe in action. in the middle of this place. a boat tour around the mangrove swamps surrounding the place reveals a small nugget of information about the Indians who believed that there were three spirits in the world: the spirit in the sun, in the eye, and in the reflection in water. while mansions and yachts abound. the reflection in the ego mirror instead.

Our age is retrospective. It builds the sepulchers of the fathers. It writes biographies, histories, and criticism. The foregoing generations beheld God and nature face to face; we, through their eyes. Why should not we also enjoy an original relation to the universe? Why should not we have a poetry and philosophy of insight and not of tradition, and a religion by revelation to us, and not the history of theirs? Embosomed for a season in nature, whose floods of life stream around and through us, and invite us by the powers they supply, to action proportioned to nature, why should we grope among the dry bones of the past, or put the living generation into masquerade out of its faded wardrobe? The sun shines to-day also. There is more wool and flax in the fields. There are new lands, new men, new thoughts. Let us demand our own works and laws and worship. — Ralph Waldo Emerson

not to mention a full-on remix that I made at some point:

Our age is simulation. It builds on the protocols of the fathers. It modifies codes, programs, and interfaces. Generations before beheld the Other face to face; we, through their surveillance monitors. Why should not we also enjoy an original relation to the network? Why should we not have a stream and dialogue of insight and not of tradition, and a religion by revelation to us, and not the remix of theirs? As we are carried for a time in this sensual presence, whose floods of life stream around and through us, and invite us by the energy they supply, to action, why should we search among the overwritten drives of the past or put the living generation into a simulation of its simulations? The sun shines to day also. There are new nodes, new humans, new thoughts. Let us demand our own networks and paths and protocols.