Stamped from the Beginning – Kendi

Continuing to pry my eyes open to the wide ignorance of growing up a privileged white male: a darkness that perhaps could have been dispelled by the obvious evidence appearing, bright, over the years. The tar-paper huts where the elementary school bus stopped, picking up many of the Black students at our rural Maryland school 35 miles outside of Washington, D.C.—south of the Mason-Dixon Line; at ten y.o., riding past “Resurrection City” on the Mall in D.C. during the Poor People’s Campaign in 1968; completely unaware of the geography of roads not taken in that long-ago rural countryside as they passed through the African-American settlements outside of the “regular” towns; blindness mixed with a slowly maturing wonder at and deep respect for African-American creativity, intelligence, and sensitivity. I surely didn’t understand the full import of the lyrics in Stevie Wonder’s “Living for the City” from his Innervisions album even after doing a report on it in 11th grade English class; nor the complexities involved in a course I took, “The Economics of Poverty,” while taking a year away from engineering school back in 1979. Maybe it was Lightnin’ Hopkins who really cracked open my soul. So many points where knowledge and feeling would have fired a deeper awareness of the ongoing and severely compromised conditions of social justice in the United States. There was not enough curiosity available within privilege.

Kendi, Ibram X. Stamped from the Beginning: The Definitive History of Racist Ideas in America. Second trade paperback edition. New York, NY: Bold Type Books, LLC, 2023.

Tracing the historical roots of ‘racist thought’ in Amurika up to contemporary times, this is a challenging read. The extraordinary level of detail and huge number of players across 400 years makes it sometimes difficult to hold onto all the facts. But the main ‘plot,’ racism, is the important point to be dissembled.

Thanks, George, for recommending this one, and thanks, Rick for earlier recommending:

Wilkerson, Isabel. Caste: The Origins of Our Discontents. Trade paperback edition. New York, NY: Random House, 2023.

and I would also include

Hannah-Jones, Nikole and New York Times Company, eds. The 1619 Project: A New Origin Story. First edition. New York, NY: One World, 2021.

and

Douglass, Frederick. Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave. Boston, MA: Anti-Slavery Office, 1845..

There are (many) Others whose histories I need yet to understand.

To Phyliss Wheatley
(First African Poetess)

No! Not like the lark, didst thou circle and sing,
High in the heavens on morn’s merry wing,
But hid in the depths of the forest’s dense shade,
There where the homes of the lowly were made,
Thou nested! Though fettered, thou frail child of night,
Thy melody trilled forth with naive delight;
And all through the throes of the night dark and long,
Earth’s favored ones harkened thy ravishing song,
So plaintive and wild, touched with Africa’s lilt;
Of wrong small complaint, sweet forgiveness of guilt-
Oh, a lyric of love and a paean of praise,
Didst thou at thy vespers, Dark Nightingale, raise;
So sweet was the hymn rippling out of the dark,
It rivalled the clear morning song of the lark.

Clifford, Carrie Williams. The Widening Light. Boston, MA: Walter Reid Company, 1922.

The Revolution of Everyday Life

Following is an excerpt, Chapter One, from an old favorite, The Revolution of Everyday Life by Raoul Vaneigem—written back in the 60s under the umbrella of the Situationists. Be forewarned, it is not a particularly easy text. Arising out of the wide-spread social unrest fomented by the post-WWII generation of European intellectuals, it contains hundreds of gems reflecting on both the roots and current realities of life. You may find it stylistically dated, lacking intersectionality, and overly idealistic, even romantic, however, there are plenty of core messages and observations that are spot on. In the current cavalcade of faux information saturation it’s well worth studying!
more “The Revolution of Everyday Life”

signal, noise

traces, Cedaredge, Colorado, March ©2022 hopkins/neoscenes.
traces, Cedaredge, Colorado, March ©2022 hopkins/neoscenes.
planets rise and fall, radiant, perturbed, tracing ecliptic-bound fate against the stars

time folds itself away, impervious to effect

privilege, a hard armor to disrobe, smothers heaving lungs, straining body, and cosseted mind.

Vital textures have changed with age

clamor, external, forces inward: internal discourse darkens:
an ease in replacing fluid thoughts with
re-creations and re-constructions of life, stripped, desiccated, unmoored

wetware loses to the external coders.

Imagination falters: social sediment unfiltered, osmotic mire clogs input,
head continues to empty of all but noise, signal lost.

And yet, occasionally
sensual input
evades the flow of debris

stars, planets, clouds, riven horizons, wing-prints in the snow. These enter the head and the heart, in silence.

secondary or primary?

Secondary or primary influences in the course of a day. As thoughts flush, septic, toxic, banal, indistinct.

Dis-ease plagues the surrounds. Time is the wait for embodied encroachment.

Later:

A fragment of pleasing life: Pleased to see calmness on her face, in her demeanor. Pleased to feel the resonance of her heart and life in her voice. Pleased that she is feeling well at the moment. Still drawn by that astonishing intelligence. It engenders endless delving into the nature of our lives. It gives me hope. Otherwise, these days I do not socialize.

Sooner:

Paycheck, taxes, investments, retirement, all terms that frame the life of artifice that follows money, follows a job along the capitalist way. Artifice, yes, art, no. Unless one holds close to mind that it is all performance art. If it wasn’t so replete with dis-spiriting human relation (hah, management!), foundering in that artifice, it might be redeemable. Redemption comes at a price, though.

end of week 1

The theater of the ‘working world’ — as random humans come together in earnest efforts to optimize the success of some shared and cooperative activity — this becomes my reality. Sacrificing personal life-time in service of the social, in recognition that social cooperation will/should ultimately convert into individual viability. The unfathomably deep internal desire to … live … is the energized basis for all social collectivity. Social structures persist through shared efforts that collectively move along a single trajectory. The trajectory determined by initial conditions as much as the social contingencies that follow.

The Field of Attention, The Field of Flows

Slipping through a day, from dawn to late evening, time is a field of flows. Attention calls flow from its progress, delineating it temporarily as distinct and heterogeneous. Pass through attentiveness, and one arrives at the granular curtain of awareness. Seeing both detail and the full over-flow of being.

Fighting to maintain constant attention to lived life. Back to breathing?

An attempt to address the title of this blog entry. Entries arise from these titles. Titles self-generate from the textures of living. Entries are attempts to address the titles, to address the textures of life, to form a text: a reduction of life. A tautology of be-ing — writing about be-ing — a pleonastic embolism destined to disrupt attention, flow, and life itself. And yet these become normative to the social. Normative to the day of lived-life, pried from living body, in service to social presence, social acceptance, and social ‘success’. If only all the world were ignorant of Plato!

Full dissertation text: The Regime of Amplification

Well, I guess it’s about time to put the PhD dissertation text out there in .pdf form, so, here it is (PDF download):

The Regime of Amplification

Have at it, be polite, no grabbing, pushing, or shoving. Do not fold, spindle, or mutilate. If you can prove that you’ve read it back to front, I’ll buy you a bottle of Herradura Añejo Tequila*, as long as we can split it!

*this is my hard liquor drink of choice since 1980 when it was hard to find even in the US southwest — cherished bottles imported into Iceland (bought in NYC at NY Liquors on Canal Street, the only place in NYC that carried it!) would last up to six months, like a fine Scottish whiskey, small glasses for sipping — none of that brutish slugging down shots or making margaritas with this fine distillate.

flip the switch and everybody will feel …

faugh. Where does this lead? Emotional manipulation by secretive corporo-mili-fiscalo-governmental(?) entities who are not responsive to any measures of civil society. Privacy is gone, now emotional authenticity is being eroded. I never quite understood how a majority of my students at CU got so defensive about their Facebook and other social media usage. Does this mean that the manipulation is so completely invisible that it qualifies for that water-to-a-fish state?

Abstract

Emotional states can be transferred to others via emotional contagion, leading people to experience the same emotions without their awareness. Emotional contagion is well established in laboratory experiments, with people transferring positive and negative emotions to others. Data from a large real-world social network, collected over a 20-y period suggests that longer-lasting moods (e.g., depression, happiness) can be transferred through networks [Fowler JH, Christakis NA (2008) BMJ 337:a2338], although the results are controversial. In an experiment with people who use Facebook, we test whether emotional contagion occurs outside of in-person interaction between individuals by reducing the amount of emotional content in the News Feed. When positive expressions were reduced, people produced fewer positive posts and more negative posts; when negative expressions were reduced, the opposite pattern occurred. These results indicate that emotions expressed by others on Facebook influence our own emotions, constituting experimental evidence for massive-scale contagion via social networks. This work also suggests that, in contrast to prevailing assumptions, in-person interaction and nonverbal cues are not strictly necessary for emotional contagion, and that the observation of others’ positive experiences constitutes a positive experience for people.

Who is paying the researcher’s wages? Why are they researching this *for Facebook*?? argh… No paranoia here, it’s more just how things work in a corrupt and morally (& fiscally!!) bankrupt regime.

we’re talking final causes here…

[C]urrently espoused, ecosystem management is a magical theory (see Ludwig 1993) that promises the impossible — that we can have our cake and eat it too. Worse, however, it addresses only the symptoms of the problem and not the problem itself. The problem is not how to maintain current levels of resource output while also maintaining ecosystem integrity; the problem is how to control population growth and constrain re­source consumption. And the solution to the problem is not anthropocentric-based ecosystem management, it is rejection of the doctrine of final causes. Humanity must begin to view itself as part of nature rather than the master of nature. It must reject the belief that nature is ours to use and control. Once this is accomplished, we can accept that the land has limits, and that to live within those limits we must halt population growth and reduce consumption. I believe this rejection of the doc­trine of final causes is at the very heart of the biocentric view of ecosystem management (see Noss & Cooper­rider 1994). Unfortunately, the “seismic shift” in the mindset of humans (Grumbine 1994) required by this
view of ecosystem management may never occur and, if it does, it will be a slow process that may come too late.

Stanley, T.R., 1995. Ecosystem Management and the Arrogance of Humanism. Conservation Biology, 9(2), pp.255–262.

you got problems? Let me tell you …

The dialectical process whereby a solution to one prob­lem generates sets of new problems that eventually pre­clude solutions is summarized in the five steps of techno-social development.

1. Because of the interrelationships and limitations existing within a closed system, a techno-social solution is never complete and hence is a quasi-solution.

2. Each quasi-solution generates a residue of new techno-social problems arising from: (a) incomplete­ness, (b) augmentation, and (c) secondary effects.

3. The new problems proliferate at a faster rate than solutions can be found to meet them.

4. Each successive set of residue problems is more difficult to solve than predecessor problems because of seven factors: (a) dynamics of technology, (b) increased complexity, (c) increased cost, (d) decreased re­sources, (e) growth and expansion, (f) requirements for greater control, and (g) inertia of social institutions.

5. The residue of unsolved techno-social problems converge in an advanced technological society to a point where techno-social solutions are no longer pos­sible.

Stanley, T.R., 1995. Ecosystem Management and the Arrogance of Humanism. Conservation Biology, 9(2), pp.255–262.

Miles

Sonya’s current jazz trumpet fav is Nicholas Payton (@paynic), so Chris writes. It’s her birthday and Payton’s in town (Denver) playing, great! Afflatus that arrives with first-person experiencing ones creative muse can be a rare and singular event in life. (It may be possible to make this a regular — daily — event: partnering with muse! What a concept!)

Payton’s a radical, Amiri-Baraka-with-trumpet, but not afraid to pick up a pen: “On Why Jazz Isn’t Cool Anymore” is of note. And he takes on the legacy of Miles without compunction, without needing to think about compunction.

And following that thread takes me back to this passage from Miles’ autobiography that resonated hard in my mind back when it came out in the early 90s:

The very first thing I remember in my early childhood is a flame, a blue flame jumping off a gas stove somebody lit. It might have been me playing around with the stove. I don’t remember who it was. Anyway, I remember being shocked by the whoosh of the blue flame jumping off the burner, the suddenness of it. That’s as far back as I can remember: any further back than this is just fog, you know, just mystery. But that stove flame is as clear as music is in my mind. I was three years old.

I saw that flame and felt that hotness of it close to my face. I felt fear, real fear, for the first time in my life. But I remember it also like some kind of adventure, some kind of weird joy, too. I guess that experience took me someplace in my head I hadn’t been before. To some frontier, the edge, maybe, of everything possible. I don’t know; I never tried to analyze it before. The fear I had was almost like an invitation, a challenge to go forward into something I knew nothing about. That’s where I think my personal philosophy of life and my commitment to everything I believe in started, with that moment.

Davis, M., 1990. Miles, The Autobiography, 1st Touchstone ed., New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.

face-to-face communications

The variable most closely associated with a wide range of positive social feelings was the same variable consistently omitted in studies of media use: time spent in face-to-face communication. Higher levels of face-to-face communication were associated with greater social success, greater feelings of normalcy, more sleep, and fewer friends whom the children’s parents believed were a bad influence. Although we cannot determine causality using this one-wave survey, the results for the clear positive correlates of face-to-face communication and the negative correlates of media multitasking are highly suggestive.

Observations suggest that children and adults are increasingly more willing to use technologies when with other people, such as texting at the dinner table and web surfing while chatting with friends (e.g., Abelson, Ledeen, & Lewis, 2008). Indeed, every category of media use except reading was positively associated with using media while interacting face to face. However, unlike media multitasking, the amount of time spent in face-to-face communication was negatively related to face-to-face multitasking. People who frequently interact with people face to face seem to feel less need to use other media while doing so. This is suggestive evidence that these high face-to-face communicating girls do not want distraction. These results provide more evidence that face-to-face communication and multitasking may attract different profiles of children or may represent participation in different social environments.

Pea, R. et al., 2012. Media use, face-to-face communication, media multitasking, and social well-being among 8- to 12-year-old girls. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), pp.327–336.

within the mean(s)

Comparison is a parasite endemic to the gut space of creativity (or is it?). In the creative moment churning presence is complete (or is it?). To compare is to step out of that moment. Attention moves to the recalled, the directed standard that comparison is predicated upon (Bateson’s ‘difference’). Centered creativity falters when full presence in the moment wavers. This is the crisis of the now, of the creative. Why this ablation of authentic process when clarity says that the creative needs no standard? It is enough that the available skills, such as they are in the moment: engage, and work proceeds. When life-energy turns to another process, the prior work is finished. It does not need to become, it simply exists in its own ground state in relation to the social system.

One might say that starting and ending points — those defining a ‘work’ — are arbitrary and subjective social abstractions.

Work is only the outgoing flow of life energies as we pass through this life. It is not that comparison is parasitic, it is life that is parasitic upon the reeling entropy of the cosmos…

Post-Growth Institute

Donnie was a colleague at UTS:

Dear Friends,

I’m really excited to share that, as part of my work at the Post Growth Institute <https://postgrowth.org/>, we’ve just launched a crowd-funding campaign to support development of a world-changing book we’re writing about a new economy beyond growth.

*How on Earth? Flourishing in a Not-for-Profit World by 2050* will be the world’s first book to explore the prospect of not-for-profit enterprise becoming the central model of local, national, and international business, by 2050.

This is a really great opportunity and I would love if you could join us in spreading the word for ‘How On Earth’ or perhaps even making a financial pledge. The future is in our hands, so for more information: https://bit.ly/how-on-earth.

Please become part of this book’s founding team.

Warmest wishes,
Donnie Maclurcan

quick notes

The N-1 event is curious — I wasn’t aware it was a pedagogic exercise to be acted out in front of (!) students at Arcada. This makes it a bit awkward with some of the invited people, though I simply jump in to the scene, aiming that for the students it would not be a business-as-usual pedagogic activity. That was hard to overcome in the lecture hall (suitably exquisite quality as is any Finnish public construct). So we oscillate in and out of the building, the lobby, outside, and so on, enjoying the cool sunshine. The students somewhat perplexed, but seemingly engaged or at least present.

Most of us live much of our lives in the ether. We have a mobile phone with us at all times with the result that we are always on and never truly alone. We have maps and geo-positioning on our phones so that we are always traceable and never truly lost. We tweet and update our Facebook status so that we often say what comes into our minds when it comes into our minds, and we are rarely truly reflective.

In all of this we are telling each other stories about what we are doing, and from this we curate stories about who we are. From all the shards and slivers that we scatter across the digiverse we are piecing together new kinds of identities – and these identities propel us in some directions and constrain us from moving in others.
more “quick notes”

systems

The basic idea behind the systems approach is that all relevant interests or values should be served by the kinds of change we can institute in our society and in nature. — Churchman

general systems theory, systems analysis, operations analysis, systems theory: is it possible to take this, maybe re-member Bertalanffy’s holism, and make something useful to creative production … ? Or is humanistic fear of systems thinking justified? Given that many aspects of the techno-social milieu we are embedded within are constructed on, many concepts are predicated on, the super-structure of systems. Doesn’t this justify at least a close look at the role of systems in effecting change in our life-trajectories?

At least it’s one pathway among others. Efficacy to be determined by future outcomes. But then, no-one will remember what the hell the initial conditions were anyway!

1493: Homogenocene

It looked an ice cream cone. But when I came closer, I realized that the boy was eating a raw sweet potato. His father had whittled at the top to expose the orange flesh, which the boy was licking; the unpeeled bottom of the sweet potato served as a handle.

This was at a farm about 300 miles northwest of Shanghai. Sweet potatoes are often eaten raw in rural China–a curiosity to Westerners like me. I didn’t realize that I had been staring until the boy ran to seek the protection of his father, who was hoeing a row of sweet potatoes. The father glared at me as I waved an apology. Because I don’t speak Chinese, I couldn’t tell him that I had been staring not at his son, but at the sweet potato in his hand. Nor could I say that I was staring because the sweet potato was an emblem of four hundred years of convulsive global change. more “1493: Homogenocene”

Trans-disciplinary Dialogue and Holistic Knowledge Generation

At its core, trans-disciplinary collaboration is chiefly a test of how to find the words, and within the words, the cumulative meanings that might span what is often a wide gulf in understandings. In general, the use of language in a transdisciplinary space is a particular challenge that, to a significant degree, determines the successful outcome of the attempt to bridge, fuse, or simply transcend disciplinary spaces altogether. Of course, beyond the words, there is the imperative for energized and embodied collaborative action, Freire’s ‘praxis'(1): change is the presumptive goal of the trans-disciplinary encounter. However, what I call the ‘meta-conditions’ of the human encounter are as or even more important than strictly linguistic exchanges. Meta-conditions deeply impress the qualities and potentialities of the human encounter that are the core of learning and change. In this White Paper I will reflect on these meta-conditions necessary to facilitate trans-disciplinary communication and collaboration. I will do this as a former engineer, a practicing ‘media’ artist, and in the context of 25 years of experience(2) teaching across art, design, engineering, and technology. The instance of my own current planning and facilitating of a (pre-existing) course I was invited to teach in the Fall of 2012 will function as an armature for the reflections. A former student of mine, Director of the TAM (Technology, Arts, and Media (3)) Program, that is hosted within the ATLAS Institute (Alliance for Technology, Learning, and Society(4)), offered me one section of “The Meaning of Information Technology”(5) course at the University of Colorado – Boulder.(6) Among other threads, my reflections will touch on re-defining the term ‘technology’ in such a way that allows more powerful critical access to that often-self-obscured aspect of our social existence, regardless of disciplinary background. I will also make some critical observations about what I understand as the deep and problematic assumptions under-girding much of contemporary education.

—————–

1) Freire, P., 2000. Pedagogy of the Oppressed, New York: Continuum.
2) https://neoscenes.net/info/cv/
3) https://tam.colorado.edu/
4) https://atlas.colorado.edu/
5) https://tam.colorado.edu/teaching.php (general program requirements for the course)
6) https://colorado.edu

shifting life-focus

it occurs to me, on the eve of shifting life-focus in a big way, that the blather of the politicos about conducting a war with only symbolic (socio-political) goals is absolute rubbish. the warring army which is imposing its highly organized (ordered) disorder/destruction on the enemy needs a concrete and vast energy source. if one result of the war is not a direct increase in the energy reserves of the warring army and its supporting social system, then conducting the war is not only fool-hardy, but doomed to failure from a simple thermo-dynamic point-of-view. to project an ordered system outwards and to impose that on another system takes energy. an army without unlimited resources will fail. and, in failing, if conducted short-sightedly, will empty the treasury. this seems to apply to the US military that has been used in numerous wars but many/most of those recent wars were not fought for explicit (and real!) resources that would feed it and the social system that spawned it. the wars were fought for ideological (socio-political) purposes espoused by the elites.

imagine the situation in Afghanistan if there had been no Iraq war? imagine if even a fraction of the natural resources of Afghanistan were left in the hands of US military-industrialists? Vietnam was the same. Korea, ditto.

the last major conflict that brought the US military-industrial complex huge resource/energy reserves was WWII, aside from minor conflicts in strategic locations (Panama, Kuwait, uh, where else?).

kudos to NASA

Curiosity and the rim of Gale Crater, Mars, August 2012

NASA does it again! The intensity and rigor of control necessary throughout the entire process of planning, fabricating, and executing such an expression of the techno-social system is remarkable. These expressions of directed and highly organized energy that a techno-social system makes may be seen as a metric correlated to the health of that system: the military-industrial-academic complex is alive and well. Not only that, NASA has successfully taken on the need to justify its existence to the population in their well-choreographed PR efforts: “Seven Minutes of Terror.”

Dialogue and Learning

My educational philosophy is built on the existence of a simple phenomena that I observe on a daily basis while moving through life. It is this — where two people can come together and have an encounter. If this encounter is at least somewhat free of conventional social strictures, and the two individuals are able to find an open path for the sharing of their life-times and energies, there arises a special situation. Following this encounter the two might step away from this encounter, both are inspired, both with an excess of energy circulating within themselves, both at a higher energy level than when they arrived an the instance of the encounter.

It is this excess of energy arising from the situation that becomes a source of creative action.

This is a fundamental in learning: To face the unknown Other, to find an open pathway for an exchange of energies, and experience the potential of energy exchange.

The degree of openness in the encounter is heavily influenced by the techno-social system that the two individuals are embedded within and the meta-conditions of their encounter.

Moving away to a wider perspective, a classroom is a multiplicity of these dialogues that have the potential to generate absolutely relevant knowledge and experience sets for/among all participants in the encounter process.

As an educator and facilitator, it is my role to change the characteristic of the space/conditions for the encounter such that there are more possibilities for it to find or create open pathways. One primary task is to be aware of and push back at least a subset of the imposed social relations/protocols that govern the encounter in order to uncover possible alternative pathways for creative collaboration.

weird phenomena: spectacle for the commoner

Deep in the age of media saturation comes this live feed… hundreds, thousands, millions of people, most with colored (or coloured) hair making videos and snappies of the spectacle with phones, digital cameras, and tablets — and this as a mere under-layer of the larger mediatory field created by the BBC. It is very different from the 1984 Olympics where the majority of people simply watched the process. See the photos below for a crowd-count on documenters — it’s maybe one for every 30-50 people. Watch the Torch Relay and the numbers are about one of every two people, or more…

Our next torchbearer should be a familiar face to those watching in Buxton. Bill Weston was made an MBE for his outstanding contribution to the community of Buxton in Derbyshire. For 15 years he was Buxton’s town crier and chairman of High Peak Mayoral Charities committee.

He also founded the Billerettes, a majorette troupe that has become internationally successful and performed in excess of 1000 events.

He’s enjoying his leg so far, mixing some high kicks with a twirl while holding both arms aloft as he soaks up the cheers.

The seamless sophistication of the web interface, with the militaristic precision of the process creates a powerful coalescing of social energy — concentrating and focusing mass human expression to support the execution of the spectacle itself, and thus concentrating energies within The State itself in what I call the ‘social energy bank’ that the State then directs and uses for its own purposes.

The accompanying image is from the running of the 1984 men’s Olympic marathon which passed by my apartment in Santa Monica. The connection between the execution of Spectacle and the ordering powers of the State are direct and manifest. The obvious is the flow control of the road, the street, as in a parade, where there is a clear and ordered demarcation between the watchers and the spectacle — in obvious contrast to the street riot which inverts the logic of the spectacle.

police, men's Olympic marathon, Santa Monica, California, August 1984

Farenheit 451 (or, the ridges of thumbprint)

Re-reading a yellowed paperback version whose spine has cracked, letting pages loose at every turning. Shall I burn it in the next sacrifice action, in a camp-fire in some wild place?

Bradbury dances around the verity of impression: or impact, or simply the realities modeled by quantum entanglement. How one action is experienced by both the specific surrounds but also by the whole cosmos. How creative energies change everything, all the time. I can’t figure it out. And especially can’t reduce it to anything sensible. Nothing that might be effective as an expression within the social system. more “Farenheit 451 (or, the ridges of thumbprint)”

Empire? so what!

Yeah, waning Empire, waxing Empire. Who cares? What if we could suddenly subtract the military from the equation of the Great American Experiment? Where would that leave the world? Where would it leave us? It’s not like militarism or the military is a cancer or anything, so I’m not talking excision of an Evil, or the elimination of warring from the human psyche. Just the simple idea of taking that particular feature of the social fabric away.

Obviously this would interest the next guys on the heap. wha? The US set aside ALL of its weapons? Turned it all into a big pile of rather useless plows? pshaw… I don’t believe it.

Actually the thought experiment can’t proceed in this direction because the practicality of the destruction of what several generations hath wrought would occasion several generations effort yet to unravel. It’s gotta be an explicitly theoretical experiment. True, it’s possible to renovate old missile silos for funky bachelor pads, but this doesn’t account for the millions of pieces of hardware floating around, the millions of acres of spilled on, bombed out, concreted-over land that was requisitioned over the years for maneuvers, vacation spaces of ranking officers, taxi-ways, and parking lots for the rolling stock. not to mention all the bunkers, the munitions, the warheads, and the entire industrial production stream that coalesced around the spigot of Federal funding to develop the entire system.

ach, too complicated a mental stretch to carry this image to a conclusion. Ever since I finished the dissertation, my head isn’t into coagulating piles of words in order to point out some obscure structural feature of the complex system that we are a part of…

The Welfare Model

In America as in Europe, Republicans argue, the welfare state is failing to provide either security or dynamism. The safety net is so expensive it won’t be there for future generations. Meanwhile, the current model shifts resources away from the innovative sectors of the economy and into the bloated state-supported ones, like health care and education. Successive presidents have layered on regulations and loopholes, creating a form of state capitalism in which big businesses thrive because they have political connections and small businesses struggle.

The welfare model favors security over risk, comfort over effort, stability over innovation. Money that could go to schools and innovation must now go to pensions and health care. This model, which once offered insurance from the disasters inherent in capitalism, has now become a giant machine for redistributing money from the future to the elderly.

This is the source of Republican extremism: the conviction that the governing model is obsolete. It needs replacing. — David Brooks editorial, NYT 15.06.2012

I would propose that the relative abundance of the historically recent welfare state is a direct result of the ‘easy’ availability of hydrocarbons. ANY abundance of energy will allow/encourage a species to expand the controlling complexity of its ‘social’ system. In the human case, it is not only the ‘welfare’ state, but the ‘defense’ state, the ‘agri’ state, the ‘industrial’ state, the ‘education’ state, and so on — the entire cumulative fabric of inter-related social systems. One single aspect (that welfare state) of the cumulative complexity cannot be blamed for our ‘problems.’ Actually, the human species, overall, with the development of its hydrocarbon energy source is wildly successful in its expansion and dominance of the globe in its entirety. The current ‘problems’ are a result of the species reaching the limits of the ability of the hydrocarbon energy source to provide structural organizing advantage and the ensuing stability of expansion/control that all living memory is accustomed to. The growing socio-economic instability of the West is a direct result of competition from other social systems for that once-easily accessible glutted energy source (that the West monopolized!). (Underscoring that the instability is not ‘just’ economic — the instability is a ‘real’ (thermodynamic) feature and a deep characteristic of the entire system — in just the same way that the initial ramping-up of the energy glut affected the entire system’s (negentropic) character of complexity and control of previously un-controlled flows — things like viral infections, the impact of ‘natural’ catastrophes on populations, and the stability of agricultural production, etc.)
more “The Welfare Model”

Ptolemy { the ancestors, the outer space }

Ptolemy:
maps: the city of the social custom:
symbolic meal:
the family:
and the table:
genesis: concentric process:
orbits:
of the sauces and the planets:
he casts: arrays:
the military religious political commercial estates:
regular eccentricities:
native bower (phalanx) of formations:
within the annular tissues:
wood: ancestral harbor:

aa’
bz

muito obrigado

Victoria (Co-ordinator of the Hackademia Festival) invites some of us bricoleurs to jump into an IRC discussion on technoshamanism connected to the technomagias festival in Maua in Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. That was a nice language riffing challenge talking about the basics of reality (and juggling with google translate made it even more interesting!). I get more and more feeling that the Brazilians are doing very interesting things, and have been doing them since way before Freire started his radical practices in social encounter and bringing back energy from instead of going straight into the ‘State’ to being sourced in community. All the Brazilians I have had the pleasure to work with, teach, or otherwise cross paths with are fantastic thinkers, doers, and lovers of life!

Prince Ihaav Been ….

*The war which funds:*
*the inflorescence **of artilleries:*
*(as symbolon cast:) soon loots: *
*soots and bares: the ganglia the marrows:*
*which the social clubs have long:*
*forgotten:*
*
*
* *PRINCE IHAAV BEEN, THE COMFORTER

continuance

looking at the blog, looking at life, comparing the two. also understanding how Facebook has almost completely sucked the life out of other online interactions. trying to decide whether or not to go back to the Twitter account, though I loathe to do so in some way, using it to drive traffic here. although the site here is still increasing traffic overall, on a continuous basis. with Twitter and FB promotion that might increase. but the whole concept is annoying even without the consideration of the privacy issues inherent in the platforms. it is a point of pride that I’ve got my own domain, running on a Linux box, (sure, with a big commercial hosting service), managing my own tech support, and posting my own content 95% of the time rather than trolling around to re-post other’s. yet always the question of relevancy arises, after the effort of the dissertation, in the unclear zone of awaiting outcomes. and the fact that this platform is a part of the PhD overall. that places a strange pressure of continuance on it. after the 18 years of online presence, irrelevance is still an issue.

Jaromil’s Law

Long story short — with trolls on the bricolabs list, Jaromil suggests:

You see: if you want to create an un/common ground of discussion among very different people, minimalism is your friend. So to say, keep your shit together. :^)

‘nuf said.

But the whole issue goes back to language. sotto voce:

Yes, the existence of a shared protocol within a social system (community, network) is a strange necessity that is demanding that we comply and yet provides the (only!) possible conduit for connection. This goes for English as it goes for IP (Internet Protocol) and for the metric system. All function similarly to control us and our expressive energies in specific ways, pathways. There is no connection without some kind of such protocol. Some are more flexible and forgiving than others that are rigid and very *unforgiving* while at the same time, flexibility carries the risk of mis-communication. This presents us always with a paradox.

And, yes, perhaps I have a bit more restricted (but also deeper) understanding of English, as a native speaker. But having lived in second-language situations most of my adult life, when I am in such a situation, I always give respect to the fact when others are using ‘my’ protocol, as I hope is returned when I am using theirs.

Whenever a new protocol is picked up to be used, the user should be aware that great damage may easily occur (in the communicative act) when the protocol is not used ‘correctly.’

History is littered with the bloody results of such mis-understandings!

If the Battles of Trafalgar and of Cape St Vincent had gone differently, indeed we would not be mostly speaking English on this list. Pero la vida es un camino extraño, eh?

cutting room floor

Within any life system there exists a deep and continuous tension between change and stasis. A system tends to be conservative and traditional for two reasons, possibly more: 1) that optimization is strictly about the conservation of energy in the process of producing and maintaining a set of pathways and, 2) it functions under the restriction that newer and possibly innovative pathways are most often constructed on the infrastructure of preceding pathways. With individuals as for large social structures, there is a certain inertia where pre-existing pathways are easier to use again. This recalls Hebb’s postulate regarding neuroplasticity: on the wider social scale, tradition: things are done this way because this is how they have always been done. The entire Regime, as the coherent expression of its predetermined pathways is directly threatened by processes of true innovation: change threatens The Regime.

cutting room floor

The cumulative fabric of the social system evolves through a constantly shifting, hybrid, and continuous field of change, affected by all flows: we might call it simply a net/archy. The differences arise largely as an effect of the varying degrees of freedom that available or potential protocols apply to the nodal/human relations. The sourcing and dynamic evolution of the protocols that govern energy-flow pathways between participants are crucial metrics of the evolving qualities of relation. This field of change is expressed simultaneously as a participatory site of tension, simmering conflict, dynamic encounter, and the vital renewal that is necessary for any viable system.[1] Control vies with autonomy at all scales from the deeply embodied to the global.

[1] As an example, Václav Havel’s well-known essay “The Power of the Powerless” contains a profound exploration of the nature of power in an extremely hierarchically-controlled social system near the end of its existence. It is a system that “for a thousand reasons, can no longer base itself on the unadulterated, brutal, and arbitrary application of power, eliminating all expressions of nonconformity. What is more, the system has become so ossified politically that there is practically no way for such nonconformity to be implemented within its official structures” (1985). It is the application of power via protocol which exerts the control and eliminates (as that exertion becomes more and more intense) any spaces for autonomy to exist. But these systems reach a saturation point where the control (and feedback) system, a necessary structural part of it, begins to absorb all the energy available to the system overall—destroying it from the ‘inside.’

Havel, V., 1985. The Power of the Powerless: citizens against the state in central-eastern Europe, Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

more cutting room floor

In the continuity of all phenomena that are sensed, a deep interdependence is a fundamental characteristic. Recalling that deployments of amplification systems exist at all scalar levels, a particular TSS may be modeled as a synergy of constituent sub-systems. However, each interdependent social system will approach the process of expressed presence somewhat differently, relative to that interdependence and to historical precedent (pre-existing pathway dependence). Globalization may be seen as essentially the wide-scaled synchronization and standardization of (some of) these differing sub-systems into widely harmonized and ordered pathways—usually to the (energy) detriment of smaller-scaled or more localized systems.

The contemporary globalized Regime stands on a (centralized) system of production and consumption [1] of amplified signals that forcefully promotes the standardization process. The originary signals are still human-to-human as in all systems, but extensive and globally-refined amplification pathways are present in many of these encounters—either by structural chance or by determined choice. In fact this is nothing new for a TSS of smaller size, but the sheer scale of construction of the necessary global infrastructures for collecting and redistributing the flows, as well as the directed flows of amplified energies themselves, is unprecedented in human history. Globalization of the Regime, as a particular scalar culmination of the once-localized system, affects every individual on the planet. more “more cutting room floor”

more cutting room floor

I’ll help you meet the unknown. I rather enjoy the unknown. At least some of it. Not all of it. Maybe later I’ll tell you about what specific unknowns I cannot deal with. Every life-form has a threshold limit for dealing with the unknown. It is much easier to meet the unknown in the company of someone who finds a particular unknown not to be unknown. Overlapping knowledge-sets are very helpful in dealing with the unknown. It’s about standing back-to-back or side-by-side sometimes. No one knows everything about everything, everyone knows something about something. And anyone who professes to know more than half about everything will not make a good traveling companion. Likewise, someone who claims they know nothing will likely end up being tedious and disagreeable in the ensuing intimate run of a road-trip. Those who presume knowledge to be a fluid condition, changeable, and in need of constant refinement are the best traveling companions.

The capacity to tolerate indeterminate or unknown situations largely rests on prior experience. But somewhere, deep within the reptilian brain is a realization that to gain the requisite rewards that life offers (are they any more than simply the continuance of life?), one has to move outwards, somehow, outwards, through, across, into the world. Riding differential gradients from less to more or more to less, you never know. This movement presumes exposure to changing fields of external flows. It means sampling those flows, carefully or with great abandon. more “more cutting room floor”

living a lie

Reading and responding to a series of transcripts of talks given more than 100 years ago by the Zen Buddhist Abbott Soyen Shaku:

Deep into the night, as other things cannot unfold, the cause of the full-on blockage appears:

I wake up in the morning with the thought that I am living a lie. A big one. The portraits, the blog, the performances, the movement, the participation, the friendships, the art, the writing, the letters, the telephone calls, the thesis, the intelligence, the teaching, the mailing-list-postings, the lectures, the workshops, the recordings, the social awareness, the travel, the online presence, the relationships, the projects, the listening to the heart, the living and the dead, the exercising (the swimming, the yoga), the eating (picking and choosing healthy things), the parenting, the collaborations, the archiving (preserving an empty past), the saving of money (preserving an empty future), it’s all a lie, a big fuckin’ lie. This is not a text about it being a lie, this is a lie.

It’s all about preserving the Self. Self-preservation. Sure to bring sufferation, yet it is how Life maintains itSelf on the planet. The retreat from pain is about Self-preservation. The fear of the Unknown is about Self-preservation.

It appears such, in the Buddhist system/model, that the very motivational essence of Life ensuring its projection into the future (to be, vis viva) is the source of suffering.

Shaku, S., 1906. Zen For Americans

outsider trading

so bumps in the road expand into mole-hills into fuckin’ Everests. ready to chuck the whole thing.

with all my travels, and participating in systems that are localized I have noted how the local participants consider that their (social institutional) system–whatever it might be—is correct, transparent, and functional (and, is optimal/optimized). In every conversation I have had with foreign graduate students in Australia’s “tertiary education” (aka – “higher ed”) system, the chief topic of conversation is how black-box the system actually is, and how locals are able to function in it much easier, setting up knowledge-tracks to quick success. Prior knowledge and simply being in the system over time (or ‘from the beginning’) is a tremendous advantage in such localized systems. Entering in the system as I have done, an outside outsider is a distinct disadvantage, and at this point, I wouldn’t recommend it to anyone. A ‘semester abroad’ to UNSW or such might be good fun, but otherwise I’ve not seen much to recommend pursuing a graduate degree. I have heard in engineering as well as humanities courses that there are so many foreign students with poor ESL skills, that there is no real possibility for classroom dialogue of any but the most basic level. This wasn’t a problem in the two courses I’ve taught, though I can understand it is definitely possible, given that 18% of all tertiary students are coming from overseas. That’s 375K students as of 2005! Four years on, the number is 629K as there has been a major push by the government to expand this lucrative source of foreign exchange. It’s the third largest ‘export’ industry, generating AUD 18 billion in 2009. (See this report and this one for reference.)

I was told that there would be no more ‘casual’ teaching positions available for me until at least 2013, at which point I wouldn’t be in the country anyway. The significant contraction comes on the heels of the expansion: “a combination of factors in the past 18 months has put the international education sector under pressure. . . . Preliminary evidence suggests that the entire sector could see a decline in enrolments of between 15 to 30% in the near future.” This would cause a loss of tens of thousands of FTE (Full-time Equivalent) teaching positions (according to the rough correlation of every 2 overseas students supports one FTE). Tough times coming for tertiary ed in Oz!

Though this is only a side-show as far as I am concerned. Actually I don’t care a rap about it! The primary issue is the interpretation gap between what I pick up (from what I am told) and what is considered ‘correct’ or ‘acceptable’ within that tertiary education system in Australia as I (perhaps) continue my pursuit of the Ph.D. The gap seems to have expanded to consume my entire thesis which is shocking. Or maybe not — the meta-structural issues that I alluded to above are no surprise at all. They are the rule rather than the exception everywhere that I’ve participated in a process deeply enough to touch them. Most people are local. That’s ‘normal.’ Sure, they travel, but not to the extent where they run into these issues. And to locals, the problems are completely invisible: it’s the fish and water syndrome. Surfacing any critique usually causes some affront — even a passing note as to “how it’s done elsewhere.” (Being a ‘Yank’ in Australia is to be even more acutely suspect of an ulterior motive with any observation — I noticed that right off during several awkward instances.)

The only times I’ve really been ‘local’ myself are during the occasional sojourns in Colorado over the years — ten years resident over the past 35. Though the residencies have been mostly brief themselves, and all the locals I know here expect me to be around only temporarily.

Local versus distal provenance is a strong determinant in social power structures. Close connection to the sources of system-wide protocols enhances access to energy sources and consequently, enhances survivability.

cutting room floor

I observe that trans-disciplinarity is itself an over-used label that hints at the need for thinking (and expressing!) outside the space defined by any limited social system. Hinting is not implementation. Innovative solutions are often found by actively combining strands of thought from disparate disciplines and idiosyncratic points of view. It is the critical engagement of a plurality of Other’s voices that is essential when engaged in trans-disciplinary (or post-disciplinary) spaces.

so fuckin’ what…?

BogoTrax: Berlin/Bogota

Bogotrax: Berlin/Bogota/Boulder, February 2012

Tapping in to the network started by the bogotrax crew, neoscenes sends an ambient mix signal to the street party in Bogota via Berlin.

(68:00, stereo audio, 163 mb)

Since 2004 Bogotrax is a self-made mixture of social action, street-arts, and retro-avant-garde. To present it as a festival of electronic music and culture could be a first stop in the way to a more complex strategy of social and artistic experimentation. But it could also be an easy way to consume it as a more or less wild product of bored entertainers. If you haven’t make the choice, we’re on our way to help you!

no title…

The deepest problems of modern life derive from the claim of the individual to preserve the autonomy and individuality of his existence in the face of overwhelming social forces, of historical heritage, of external culture, and of the technique of life. The fight with nature which primitive man has to wage for his bodily existence attains in this modern form its latest transformation. The eighteenth century called upon man to free himself of all the historical bonds in the state and in religion, in morals and in economics. Man’s nature, originally good and common to all, should develop unhampered. In addition to more liberty, the nineteenth century demanded the functional specialization of man and his work; this specialization makes one individual incomparable to another, and each of them indispensable to the highest possible extent. However, this specialization makes each man the more directly dependent upon the supplementary activities of all others. Nietzsche sees the full development of the individual conditioned by the most ruthless struggle of individuals; socialism believes in the suppression of all competition for the same reason. Be that as it may, in all these positions the same basic motive is at work: the person resists to being leveled down and worn out by a social-technological mechanism. An inquiry into the inner meaning of specifically modern life and its products, into the soul of the cultural body, so to speak, must seek to solve the equation which structures like the metropolis set up between the individual and the super-individual contents of life. Such an inquiry must answer the question of how the personality accommodates itself in the adjustments to external forces. — Georg Simmel

Simmel, G., 1950. The Metropolis & Mental Life. In The Sociology of Georg Simmel. New York, NY: Free Press.

words and meaning: sensus commūnis

Now attempting the abstract which should have been in last week for the formal Notification of Intention (to submit). Words are reified by applied meanings (to their largely abstract sounds); yet words can be made to have other meanings. Where on this Occam’s razor is the sitting more comfortable? Or is it time to just jump off and risk coming into contact with the blade in the process, but otherwise escaping the challenge of making meaning so ‘simple’ that is ‘acceptable.’ I like to think that I say what I mean, and it just happens sometimes that the meaning is not so common, so I bear mis-understanding as a price for this act of saying. This is a prime example of the lossyness of mediatory carriers. The OED (Oxford English Dictionary) has been a constant companion since I realized I had free (university) access to it. I like the Old English and Norsk usage examples which are given for some words going back to the 8th Century or earlier. Thanks to knowing Icelandic! Best of all are the full etymologies which trace the lineage of shifting meaning as attached to these bits of symbolic chicken-scratch. ‘Commonsensical’ meanings are nothing more than the dominant understanding (or lack thereof) of the shifting sands of language. For example, the OED definition of ‘common sense,’ see below, m’gosh!
more “words and meaning: sensus commūnis”

Veteran Fact Sheet

Veteran Statistics
— There are approximately 25 million veterans of the U.S. Armed Forces alive today (7.5 % are women).
— Some 7.2 million of those veterans are enrolled in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) system; approximately 5.5 million receive health care and 3.4 million receive benefits.
— Since October 2001, approximately 1.6 million members of the Armed Forces have served in Iraq or Afghanistan. As of December 31, 2007, more than 800,000 veterans of these conflicts were eligible for VA health care.
— There are about 37 million dependents (spouses and dependent children) of living veterans and survivors of deceased veterans. Together they represent 20% of the U.S. population.
— Most veterans living today served during times of war. The Vietnam Era veteran, about 7.9 million, is the largest segment of the veteran population.
— There are approximately (as of October 2007) 2,911,900 WWII veterans alive, but they are passing away at a rate of 1,000 per day (approx. total today 2,583,400)
— In 2007, the median age of all living veterans was 60 years old, 61 for men and 47 for women.
— Median ages by period of service: Gulf War, 37 years old; Vietnam War, 60; Korean War, 76; and WW II 84.
— The percentage of the veteran population over 65 is 39.1%.
— Sixty percent (60%) of the nation’s veterans live in urban areas and six states account for about 36% of the total vet population. They are California, Florida, Texas, Pennsylvania, New York and Ohio, respectively.
— Veteran Population by Race: White 80.0%; Black 10.9%; Asian/Pacific Islander 1.4%; Hispanic 5.6%; American Indian/Alaska Natives 0.8%; Other 1.3%
— Approximately 150,000 of our nation’s veterans are homeless.

Suicide Rates
— Veterans are more than twice as likely as non-veterans to commit suicide and the “Katz Suicide Study,” dated February 21, 2008, found that suicide rates among veterans are approximately 3 times higher than in the general population.
— The VA’s own data indicate that an average of four to five veterans commit suicide each day.
— A document from the VA Inspector General’s Office, dated May 10, 2007, indicates that the suicide rate among individuals in the VA’s care may be as high as 7.5 times the national average.
— According to internal VA emails, there are approximately 1,000 suicide attempts per month among veterans seen in VA medical facilities.
— The VA has hired suicide prevention counselors at each of its 153 medical centers to help support the national suicide prevention hotline.

PTSD
— Approximately 300,000 veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars – nearly 20% of the returning forces – are likely to suffer from either PTSD or major depression, and these numbers continue to climb.
— An additional 320,000 of the returning veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan may have experienced traumatic brain injuries during deployment.
— By fiscal year 2005, the VA’s own statistics indicated that PTSD was the fourth most common service-related disability for service members receiving benefits.
— While there is no cure for PTSD, early identification and treatment of PTSD symptoms may lessen the severity of the condition and improve the overall quality of life for veterans suffering from this condition.

Unhappy Meals

This article/essay by Michael Pollan is an extremely well-framed case-in-point about how a techno-social system (TSS) will — with science leading the way — reconfigure the energy flows (FOOD!) that we are immersed within. And how evolved sub-systems with a Machiavellian stake in the distribution of power in the TSS will fall all over themselves to retain the power they already have, or will develop new ways to siphon the power away from individuals participating in the system. Individual participants, aggregated as “the population” are still the main source of accumulated hierarchic power in the system. Anyone hoping to accumulate a power-base has to, at some level, attract the attention (life-energy/life-time) of that base. The food industry (and its constituent sub-industries) is no exception, nor is the ‘big science’ sector (which has to justify its existence through churning out ‘sensible’ information (nutrition research: always filtered, dumbed-down, by intercessory media voices)) — and neither of these ‘players’ are willing to be ‘regulated’ by the government which subsidizes their existence. Remember all those “drink milk” ads some years back? All the subsidies have gone underground, so is mostly invisible to the undiscerning eye. The consumer only sees the contents of the grocery-store shelves.
more “Unhappy Meals”

solving this?

But we are up against a curious paradox. Something of immense importance to all of us does not find expression in the literary arts. The rational side of man, with its scientific and technological expressions, gets little literary space. It is curious that science and technology have always occupied so small a place in literature. What important literary figure, except Diderot, seriously occupied himself with the problems of technology? This is all the more extraordinary when one considers that literature is supposed to hold the mirror up to life. In life people spend a great deal of time involved in the technology of the period in which they live. They work, and their jobs are connected with technology and the organizations technology engenders. Yet one sees little evidence of this in literature. — Aldous Huxley

I have a little hope to somehow tap into a solution, or, an attack on this issue. The issue did come into my awareness this past spring, in Melbourne, following some conversations with different ‘humanists’ where I realized how poorly they understand the operational paradigms of technology. And, how they look at the world through a literal or metaphoric lens which effects an almost-complete disjunction between the ‘realities’ of the (techno-)social system that they are fully embedded within, and how they imagine that social system operates.

So, today I have to forge a short footnote on the ideas behind “systems theory” for a general and likely unwitting audience. Not easy.

But did turn in a final draft a couple days ago. One hurdle, now 120 days of writerly hell ahead.

revolution?

For revolutionary educators, knowledge exceeds its semiotic end products; it travels intertextually within demarcated systems of intelligibility. Critical knowledge is understood as persistently open, disclosive, incomplete, and open-ended. In this way it remains cautious in the presence of reified social relations and epistemological distortions that occlude the social ontology of knowledge and its processual journey from fact to value. In other words, critical epistemological practice examines not only the content of knowledge, but also its method of production. It seeks to understand how ideological constructions are encoded and administered, how metonymic and synecdochical gestures are performed so as to obscure relations of domination and oppression, how the interpretive and interpellative frameworks by which we organize our sentiments construct ruling stereotypes, and how the governing categories of our everyday discourse render invisible and obscure real social relations of exploitation. — (McLaren, P., 2001. Che Guevara, Paulo Freire, and the Politics of Hope: Reclaiming Critical Pedagogy. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies.)

Aside from the monumental use of academic blah-blah-blah here, the idea behind the obscurity is valid. That is, a radical approach to the facilitation of transformative learning requires a deep awareness of more than just a subject. It demands an awareness of how an embodied knowledge of that subject is founded or generated or discovered. This “how” is in many cases far more important than the “what” of knowledge. I describe this “how” as the meta-structures under which the learning is undertaken. It can be a material issue — bricks-and-mortar, the architectural setting — but also, consequent to an energy-based worldview, it is also a critical question of the entire set of flows within which the encounter is taking place. This is far, far more than opening a classroom window for fresh air, or sitting under a tree with a group of students, although the change in the energy ‘content’ of the situation can be quite profoundly altered by small actions on or reactions to the locale. An energy perception drives much deeper into the meta-structures than that, although any awareness is a good starting point. Because the energy content of the situation is most profoundly affected by the presence of the Self and the Others, the entire energy dynamic among participants must also receive this attention and care. This dynamic is more fundamental than ‘merely’ the social — it is expressed in my concept of continuum-of-relation, defined as the total accumulated network of relations, expressed as activated exchanges of energy, as Dialogues, that have occurred, are occurring, and will occur between members of the species. A holistic awareness of this continuum is necessary to optimize the facilitation.

No revolution is possible among people using language as per McLaren!

cranking up the heat…

more nettime volleys, feels a bit easier to be pointed and precise, but the problem of establishing a set of base assumptions about reality still dogs the process — with the dominant Cartesian separation needing to be convincingly rejected for a more sane continuous and implicate cosmos…

Mark Stahlman writes in this thread:

So, give up your plans for “radical change of the system we live under” and *just* STOP living under that system (at least for the better half of your life)!

I respond sotto voce, etc:
more “cranking up the heat…”

some points and hints for students :: a remix

point == be where you are, look deep into the world from your point of view, and into the self, and out to the Other. share what you experience

point == find a flow that you can tap into, do so, pay attention to it, and see where it takes you

point == learn how to focus your energies on something; do that, at least for a time, and see what reflects and refracts from that focus

point == be sensitive to what resonates in/with your system; when something resonates, listen to the tone of the heart and any other resonate sounds within

point == action makes anything possible — there is no such thing as failure, there is only change

point == be open to all possible flows — incoming and outgoing — this will show up as a(n) (r)evolution in your life as well as a lived practice (praxis)

point == movement along/with(in) an intuitive flow will reveal truth in ever-changing forms — seek out that internal movement

point == creativity and rationality are two words that partially describe human behaviors — no words can describe the full reality of behavior. creativity is the movement of energies, rationality is the play of social abstractions — deal with both, you will have to anyway

point == seriously enjoy what you do, — if you don’t, then try changing what you do until the enjoyment returns — smile, it’s Lighter than you think

point == keep your own rules and points in mind while understanding that rules are only socially applied pathways that determine possible ways of human collaboration. collaborate often: define new pathways!

hints:

breathe, listen to your breath, listen to the breath of other things

understand what energy is and where your energy comes from

be a receiver and transmitter of energy

be open to energy flows

absorb many forms of energy

internalize or embody memory

drink plenty of water

be someplace, not just anyplace, and not everywhere

participate : share

watch the sky often

Sunday, 29 October, 1961

Took family to SS & church. HJO had an excellent sermon (which he read) on “Education: Africa and America,” wherein he defined the basic issues, concluding that America can revitalize her “self-appointed leadership”… to use an African phrase … by genuine spiritual rebirth and a consequent reorientation in our treatment of minorities.

Went in in the evening to pick up DCH.

Let them eat cake?

Framing (of) the Flow: re-distribution and the occupation of Wall Street.

A closer look at protocol and flow: the guiding of energies that is applied by protocol, how protocol affects flow, and, finally, how flow affects the distribution of energy and power in a system.

Re-distribution arrives: a media blurb in the face of the ruling class, framing their stupid public squabbles that now merely parrot vacuous resonances of “Let them eat cake.

Any techno-social system (TSS) is fundamentally comprised of a set of pathways along which ‘naturally’ occurring energy (re)sources are directed ostensibly for the overall good of that system. (note: not necessarily for the good of each individual participant in that system!) The imposition of these directed pathways suggests that the resulting distribution of the energies flowing from those sources is not uniform: there are concentrations of energy (power!) and consequently there are regions of energy (order!) deficit. (note: the flows are not merely defined by spatial and temporal frames of reference!) These inequities are present from the moment that ‘naturally’ occurring flows are re-directed in service of the techno-social system. It is largely because of the specific nature of the imposed protocols which (re)direct the flows that the distributions of energy are consequently imbalanced. (At the same time it is important to remember that energy/power is not distributed evenly at any scale!)
more “Let them eat cake?”

Energy for the Warfighter

In speaking about the US military, I’ve often used the simplified example that it has only six weeks of strategic petroleum reserves (of sweet and sour crude) that it can reliably deploy in the short-term. When that oil runs out the military machine largely grinds to a halt. I decided I needed to fill out the nuances of the situation by tapping into some CSIS briefings on Operational Energy Strategy looking at optimization, reduction of consumption, and implementation of systems that make the logistical problems of fuel access and dependence mission-neutral. There is a government site documenting some of the issues. And there is the DOD Energy Blog. These sources provide a number of in-depth explorations which illustrate the vulnerability of the overall techno-social system to energy deprivation and the current rising crisis which dominoes behind greater world energy demand.
more “Energy for the Warfighter”